I am at a large law firm knowledge management conference. The morning session was Does Enterprise 2.0 = 2 Knowledge Management 2.0 and featured Dan Keldsen, Director of Market Intelligence and Carl Frappaolo, VP Market Intelligence, both associated with AIIM. This was one of the more interesting KM sessions I’ve attended in a while.
Here are highlights of the session:
Interesting group exercise to define themes [conference organizers take note - this is a great approach]
i. Split into 2 groups
ii. Write terms on Post-It Notes - keep to 1 or 2 words - to describe E2.0 and KM2.0
iii. Put all the Post-It Notes on a wall
iv. Each group de-duplicates Post-It Notes and organizes by theme
Enterprise 2.0 Themes
i. Collaboration
ii. Social networking
iii. Knowledge sharing
iv. Search
v. Virtual organization
KM 2.0 Themes
i. Training and PD
ii. Forms and precedents
iii. People and processes
iv. Taxonomy, content organization
v. Sharing, gathering, and re-using
Comments on excercise
i. Paper exercise illustrates the wiki approach of group authorship
ii. Exercise shows that tools do not help reconcile differences of views in groups
Commonalities across the KM and Enterprise 2.0
i. Search, collaboration
ii. People
iii. Technology
iv. Sharing information
What’s new if we accept premise that the basic tenets of KM don’t change because of Enterprise 2.0?
Four elements of KM, irrespective tools and jargon
i. Business strategy and purpose
ii. Process
iii. Technology
iv. People (allegiances, incentives, inclinations, respect, trust) - this does not go away, irrespective of technology. Open access to technology does not mean everyone has an equal voice.
Legacy technology and KM
i. Intermediation - Groupware, profiling, e-mail [sharing views and info]
ii. Externalization - doc man, visualization, portals [to capture explicit know-how]
iii. Internalization - search, taxonomies, agents [to help users find info]
iv. Cognition - workflow, decision support [to help drive decision making]
New tech and KM
i. Intermediation - wikis, blogs, social network analysis [sharing views and info]
ii. Externalization - wikis, blogs, podcasting [to capture explicit know-how]
iii. Internalization - RSS, mashup, search, social tagging [to help users find info]
iv. Cognition - RSS mashup [to help drive decision making]
New in technology (From Q1 2008 research available from AIIM).
i. Low barrier and ease of implementation
ii. Web and widely accessible
iii. Lean
iv. Low cost
v. Agile
vi. Emergent and heuristic [drastically reduced delivery time for new applications]
Critical to understand if an organization is ready for a new technology. You cannot use new technology to drive organizational change
Strategic Legal Technology 



Ron:
Great and accurate synopsis of the presentation. You were paying attention. Thank you for doing this. For those that are interested I will be posting the slides we used to slideshare.com, and have added my own commentary on the event, along with a link to an article in The Economist that discusses e-discovery and web 2.0 content, to my blog - www.takingaiim.com.
Great meeting you.
Comment by Carl Frappaolo 10/3/2008 @ 11:40 am
Ron,
E 2.0 is KM 2.0-driven content domain. But, KM 2.0 is context-oriented tools to carry out content communication of E 2.0
Regarding the issue, I’d like you to sign up either as an active or just a pasive member in Social Networking Site MOBEE KNOWLEDGE COP (COP= Community of Practice) by “copy/paste/click"-ing the discussion link : http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topic/show?2090583%3ATopic%3A2062 The title is :"OUR KNOWLEDGE MAP”
I hope it will give you the holistic picture of our SNS in which the heading written as :"Learn how to be in state of LEARNING, GROWTH, and INNOVATION through our Community of Practice (COP) in Knowledge Management (KM)”
Thank you
Comment by Md Santo 10/5/2008 @ 2:34 pm